A fun, hypothetical question: If there was a reasonable, practical way (through science and surgery, not witchcraft or magic) that you could proportionally lengthen your legs a few inches with the same relative ease you can increase your bust, would you do it? And if you could only afford one or the other, which would it be?
I'm guessing in the latter case, it would still be the bustline, since I'm not sure leg length has as much importance for the allure of a dancer as bust size does.
Your thoughts, please...



Reply With Quote

I believe you Dottie and you have my support 

I've a small chest... 32B by American standards.




Bookmarks