Okay, so aren't Republicans supposed to be fiscally conservative as opposed to us big bad "tax and spend" Democrats?
So what the hell is up with Bush's latest financial fiasco of passing on TEN MILLION PLUS of the Inauguration costs to the city of Washington, D.C., where his percentage of votes won was in the single digits?
Why isn't Kenny Boy Lay paying for this? I assume he still has plenty of money after fleecing the receptionists at Enron out of their life savings and still not being held accountable for it.
There is already $40 million in the Inaugural coffers, so why make the taxpayers pay even more when D.C. schools are war zones and the charity hospital is in constant danger of closing due to underfunding?
Isn't fiscal conservatism supposed to be a major tenet of the GOP? Or is this just something else that the neocons have chosen to stick their head in the sand about and be intentionally obtuse?






Bookmarks