Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 117

Thread: who's twisting these biatches tits?

  1. #1
    God/dess mr_punk's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Arrr! gimme no trouble, girl! Cap'n Trumpet's the name. Now, blow it.
    Posts
    2,863
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

    Default who's twisting these biatches tits?

    has anyone seen this site? i don't know if these broads are on permanent PMS or what. frankly, i think they go overboard in some instances. in fact, i'm sure there's a reasonable explanation behind many of the incidents. for example:

    case #1: understandably, this guy is going commando to keep the frank and beans cool. obviously, he had a wardrobe malfuntion with his shorts. hey, it's happens to customers all the time in sc. sometimes, my willy accidentally falls out of my shorts and into a stripper's mouth.

    case #2: frankly, this is a reprehensible stereotype against construction workers. they do not stand around whistling and leering at women on the job. secondly, it is well-known that the phrase,"Yo baby!" is construction speak for, "watch out for that girder".

    case #3: having watched plenty of annie sprinkle movies. she would probably say that these young men are NYU film students working on their thesis film entitled, "Donkey Punch II: The Return of Red Sock".

    case #4: okay..it's looks like a guy taking a leak from a fire escape in NYC. are you kidding me? it's NY. what do you want him to do? go downstairs and pee in the alley like everyone else?

    case #5: clearly, it's a statement of fact rather than one of harassment. which is why it's important for women to douche when they're not feeling as fresh and clean as a mountain spring.

    Is it not a problem that the woman have a smaller brain than a man? The government scientist Dr. Yamuka has proved it is size of squirrel. - Borat

    Alan Marciano
    : Oh, man...(to himself) Why did I get mixed up with that bitch?
    Lt. Vincent Hanna: Cause she's got a great ass and you got your head all the way up it! - from the movie "Heat".

  2. #2
    God/dess
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,218
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 209 Times in 142 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    I love the double standards.

    I quote: "Question: I am a man who was recently sexually objectified by a woman on the street. I think this is reverse harassment. Why won’t you post my story? Answer: While a woman making unsolicited sexual remarks to a man is certainly conceivable, the power dynamics of such an encounter are very different in a society where women comprise a historically subordinated group."

    Not to mention the WFT language:

    "...aren’t you worried that your site will fuel the latent vindictiveness within women and LGBTQ-identified folks across the country, leading to a massive witch-hunt and rampant Soviet-style denounciations of countless innocents?"

    Granted, it's not too much fun being the recipicant of unwelcome remarks, but isn't there a whiff of political agenda here?

    Phil.

  3. #3
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Well, they're couching it as a socio-political issue. So I'd say yes, there is a political agenda.
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  4. #4
    God/dess doc-catfish's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    123 Tornado Alley Way, Hooterville USA
    Posts
    6,322
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    God, after reading that, some of the more nauseating sections of SW are actually palatable.


    This one from the FAQ just got me rolling:

    Question: So let’s say a man sees a woman he thinks is attractive and tells her so. Are you saying that makes him a harasser?
    Answer: Some do not find comments such as “Hello, beautiful” or “Hey, gorgeous” offensive. Many do. Others may find them intimidating, intrusive, or just an annoying pain in the ass. Keep in mind that many women experience unsolicited comments, as well as violent verbal assault, from men in public spaces on a regular basis. Rather than deliberating the “grey areas” of street harassment, treat everyone you encounter with respect.


    In otherwords, "Keep your mouth shut and don't open any doors for me, you penis-carrying, sports watching, beer guzzling, pickup truck driving, neanderthal pig".

    And they wonder why we flee to strip clubs.

    Needless to say, I wonder how long its going to be before one of the photographed parties files a lawsuit. I mean, just because one has possession of a camera phone doesn't make them judge and jury.

    http://www.wirelessmoment.com/2006/0...cations_o.html
    Former SCJ now in rehab.

  5. #5
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    ^^^
    I'm sorry, doc, are you so enamoured of your privilege of making gratuitous sexual comments at strange women that you feel anyone who finds it distasteful hates all men?

    I mean, the article on further implications is interesting, but do you really want to defend some guy's privilege to harass a woman on the street?
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  6. #6
    God/dess doc-catfish's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    123 Tornado Alley Way, Hooterville USA
    Posts
    6,322
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny View Post
    ^^^
    I'm sorry, doc, are you so enamoured of your privilege of making gratuitous sexual comments at strange women that you feel anyone who finds it distasteful hates all men?
    That's the thing. I was raised to be courteous and respectful towards women, therefore I don't make gratuitous sexual comments at strange women, at least not intentionally. The people who spew vitriol like that posted on the HB website though think that I need to be informed, like I was raised by wolves or something.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny View Post
    ^^^
    I mean, the article on further implications is interesting, but do you really want to defend some guy's privilege to harass a woman on the street?
    No, but by what standard does having a still picture of oneself posted on that website constitute guilt? I mean, for all we know, the person who posted the pic could have been pissed because the person pictured stood them up for a date or something. The accused have no way to defend themselves, and the accuser's insinuations are treated as Gospel.

    Needless to say, I don't know what the owners of that website think they are going to accomplish seeing as it will have all the effectiveness of a "Keep Off The Grass" sign. Men who are complying with the anti-harrassment folks wishes, don't need to be told to be non-harrassing, and find it rather insulting that they need to be told (as if possession of a y-chromosone outweighs years of upstanding behavior towards women). You don't need to post a sign to keep those people off your lawn. They do it out of common courtesy.

    On the flipside, most men who act like pigs, know full and well they are acting like pigs, and stating in any way to the offending party that one is offended by their behavior is merely inviting them to be twice as piggish. They'll see the "Keep Off" sign, track their feet on the lawn, and pee all over the place while they're at it.

    In short, in the name of "empowerment" the HB folks really just end up empowering their enemies, and alienating others who might otherwise sympathize with them. Not very linear thinking IMO.
    Former SCJ now in rehab.

  7. #7
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by doc-catfish View Post
    That's the thing. I was raised to be courteous and respectful towards women, therefore I don't make gratuitous sexual comments at strange women, at least not intentionally. The people who spew vitriol like that posted on the HB website though think that I need to be informed, like I was raised by wolves or something.
    I think that is great. But why, exactly (and I didn't read the website carefully, so I am actually asking) do you think that it is targetted, in a condescending way at guys who realize that behaviour is rude? Like as opposed to at people who actually make the arguments as listed? (and yes - if you are wondering there are guys who wonder why women get offended when they say... you know, things).


    No, but by what standard does having a still picture of oneself posted on that website constitute guilt? I mean, for all we know, the person who posted the pic could have been pissed because the person pictured stood them up for a date or something. The accused have no way to defend themselves, and the accuser's insinuations are treated as Gospel.
    I don't know that it is treated as Gospel. It is one sided, certainly. However, I might further ask why one would have to be so careful with assigning "guilt" in this context - I mean, as you said, there is no judge and jury. In the other examples listed in your article on the other hand, there are potentially serious consequences.

    Needless to say, I don't know what the owners of that website think they are going to accomplish seeing as it will have all the effectiveness of a "Keep Off The Grass" sign. Men who are complying with the anti-harrassment folks wishes, don't need to be told to be non-harrassing, and find it rather insulting that they need to be told (as if possession of a y-chromosone outweighs years of upstanding behavior towards women). You don't need to post a sign to keep those people off your lawn. They do it out of common courtesy.
    I think the point is to reverse the act, to assign the shame involved in the harassment to the harassers rather than simply accepting it. She described one incident in which a guy said something and when she took out her camera he threw his hand over his face, etc., etc., so it clearly works to some degree.

    On the flipside, most men who act like pigs, know full and well they are acting like pigs, and stating in any way to the offending party that one is offended by their behavior is merely inviting them to be twice as piggish. They'll see the "Keep Off" sign, track their feet on the lawn, and pee all over the place while they're at it.
    Well, apparently not. Making shameful behaviour public is apparently a good way of curbing it - I already used my example above.

    In short, in the name of "empowerment" the HB folks really just end up empowering their enemies, and alienating others who might otherwise sympathize with them. Not very linear thinking IMO.
    I would suspect that what you call "alienation" is more a knee jerk reaction than anything else. I mean, you just said that it isn't targetting behaviour that you condone; and I think that the FAQs are sometimes facetious but I can't see it as offensive (even if you disagree with their assessment on male/female social power structures). So why does it alienate you, exactly?
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  8. #8
    God/dess mr_punk's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Arrr! gimme no trouble, girl! Cap'n Trumpet's the name. Now, blow it.
    Posts
    2,863
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by doc-catfish
    This one from the FAQ just got me rolling:
    in all seriousness, i was thinking the same thing, but that's PC for you. in their eyes, there's no difference between the guy jerking off besides a woman on a train and the guy who says "hey, gorgeous" while walking past a woman on the street. while, i can sympathize with examples of the former. i'm thinking, "get a life" when i see examples of the latter.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    I mean, the article on further implications is interesting, but do you really want to defend some guy's privilege to harass a woman on the street?
    now, that's a surprising comment from someone who jumped all over MW for posting pictures on here. oh, silly me. it's not surprising when one factors in the opportunity to stick it to the man at all costs.
    Is it not a problem that the woman have a smaller brain than a man? The government scientist Dr. Yamuka has proved it is size of squirrel. - Borat

    Alan Marciano
    : Oh, man...(to himself) Why did I get mixed up with that bitch?
    Lt. Vincent Hanna: Cause she's got a great ass and you got your head all the way up it! - from the movie "Heat".

  9. #9
    God/dess doc-catfish's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    123 Tornado Alley Way, Hooterville USA
    Posts
    6,322
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Here's a pic right off their homepage.

    http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4...00/ivypost.jpg

    Street harrassment or not? You be the judge.
    .
    Former SCJ now in rehab.

  10. #10
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by doc-catfish View Post
    Here's a pic right off their homepage.

    http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4...00/ivypost.jpg

    Street harrassment or not? You be the judge.
    .
    I would agree that simply looking at the girl is not harassment, and there is no story to situate it (because none of the photos in themselves reveal harassment, just the harassers). However, is that really the norm of the site? Most of the entries I saw were actually from very young girls describing some fairly disgusting verbal commentary (and really, although I don't at this moment see what about the site is victimizing you guys, I really don't see this as the kind of thing that most adult women take time out of their day to do). So do you think that the site focuses on what is generally unobjectionable behaviour, or is that photo an exception?

    In terms of the guys in that photo - considering that all it shows him doing is looking at a girl, and there is nothing accusing him falsely of anything else, it hardly seems like branding him with a scarlet letter.
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  11. #11
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_punk View Post
    now, that's a surprising comment from someone who jumped all over MW for posting pictures on here. oh, silly me. it's not surprising when one factors in the opportunity to stick it to the man at all costs.
    Hmm. Posting a picture of a woman who is meant to be your friend without her permission when you've been discussing her sexuality with strangers over the internet, versus posting a photo with a story of someone who harasses strangers on a street... yes anyone who objects to one and not the other clearly has drastic inconsistencies. Oh wait. That actually seems perfectly normal. Like, I also think it is okay to put people in prison AFTER they've been convicted of a crime, but I don't think it is okay to put them in prison just randomly. And I think it is okay to hit someone after they have hit you, but I don't think it's okay just to walk up and and hit someone. I mean geez - you think maybe context and the behaviour leading up to the incident makes a difference?

    And, not for nothing, but he emailed her and got permission in like 10 seconds. It was hardly onerous, and the permission makes all the difference.
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  12. #12
    God/dess mr_punk's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Arrr! gimme no trouble, girl! Cap'n Trumpet's the name. Now, blow it.
    Posts
    2,863
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by doc-catfish
    Street harrassment or not? You be the judge.
    that's exactly, what i'm talking about, doc. never mind the fact that the woman actually being "harrassed" isn't taking the picture. it's incidents like this which makes me not take them seriously.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    Hmm. Posting a picture of a woman who is meant to be your friend without her permission when you've been discussing her sexuality with strangers over the internet, versus posting a photo with a story of someone who harasses strangers on a street.
    hmm..and nary a mention of the word "permission" in both cases. then again, perhaps you think a man (which seems the operative word to the PC police) who "harasses" a woman (never mind that men don't really count in reverse cases) on the street magically gave his permission to post his photo on the internet.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    And, not for nothing, but he emailed her and got permission in like 10 seconds. It was hardly onerous, and the permission makes all the difference.
    And, not for nothing. many of these ladies don't get permission. i'm just saying that doesn't seem to bother you. but hey, i understand. some things are worth doing if you can stick it to the man.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    However, is that really the norm of the site?
    yes, that is normal according to their FAQ and some the postings. i mean, obviously HB doesn't have a problem with it.
    Is it not a problem that the woman have a smaller brain than a man? The government scientist Dr. Yamuka has proved it is size of squirrel. - Borat

    Alan Marciano
    : Oh, man...(to himself) Why did I get mixed up with that bitch?
    Lt. Vincent Hanna: Cause she's got a great ass and you got your head all the way up it! - from the movie "Heat".

  13. #13
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_punk View Post
    hmm..and nary a mention of the word "permission" in both cases.
    Well, I thought it was a given that it is because one act is culpable and the other is not. I mean surely MW is not interested in publically shaming this nice woman who was kind enough to give him the best sex of his life? So then what's the problem with an email to her that reads "So, I've been discussing how great you are in bed with strangers on this website called stripclubjunkie, and would love to post a pic so they can put a face to the story"? On the other hand, guys who are harassing you in public are not entitled to that courtesy. This is seriously contentious? That we need to treat strangers harassing us with the same courtesy that we treat our friends or, for that matter, strangers who are not harassing us?

    then again, perhaps you think a man (which seems the operative word to the PC police) who "harasses" a woman (never mind that men don't really count in reverse cases) on the street magically gave his permission to post his photo on the internet.
    Well, not for nothing, but they didn't say that men didn't count in reverse cases; they said that their website was dedicated to certain kind of power dynamic and not just a repository for unpleasant incidents. They didn't say either that it never happened, or that men had to like it. Just that it incidents of that kind weren't part of a greater social structure. Now intelligent people could (I suppose) disagree on the existence of that power structure and whether "reverse harassment" (which does not make sense to me as a term) fits into it, but intelligent people can't simply collapse what they said into "men don't count."
    And, not for nothing. many of these ladies don't get permission. i'm just saying that doesn't seem to bother you. but hey, i understand. some things are worth doing if you can stick it to the man.
    Well, I think I addressed this. Culpable versus non-culpable behaviour. It's silly to act like they should be met with the same kind of deference.

    yes, that is normal according to their FAQ and some the postings. i mean, obviously HB doesn't have a problem with it.
    Okay... I mean, not the impression I got from reading the entries, but as I said, I didn't read carefully so I'll trust you. However, the principle argument there is WHAT constitutes street harassment, not that harassers shouldn't be photographed and blogged or that street harassment is not big deal that women should just suck up.
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  14. #14
    Featured Member evan_essence's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Posts
    1,613
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_punk View Post
    in all seriousness, i was thinking the same thing, but that's PC for you. in their eyes, there's no difference between the guy jerking off besides a woman on a train and the guy who says "hey, gorgeous" while walking past a woman on the street. while, i can sympathize with examples of the former.
    You can?? Gee, that's funny. I hardly call it sympathizing in your original post to dismiss the picture of the guy exposing his genitals in public like it were a joke. See, this is what I call irony. You griping that the women can't discern the difference between "hey babe" and Mr. Dickout after you've clearly classified all of the behavior as no big thang. Sorry chief, you've backed yourself into an untenable position. If you think none of it's a big deal, as is obvious by the contents of your first post and subject line, then you've painted yourself with the same brush as those who think it's all a big deal.

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_punk View Post
    that's exactly, what i'm talking about, doc. never mind the fact that the woman actually being "harrassed" isn't taking the picture. it's incidents like this which makes me not take them seriously.
    Bwahahahahaha. Honey, you didn't even link to that picture when you dismissed the documented cases as if they were nothing. Don't try to reverse engineer justification for what you originally posted.

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_punk View Post
    hmm..and nary a mention of the word "permission" in both cases.
    Permission? You mean like the kind of permission the exposed guy got from an unsuspecting public? Where's your complaint about his permission? Seems more like you're giving him an attaboy for not getting permission.

    And, besides, Denny Crane, what makes you think the law requires permission to take a photo of a person in public view and post it to a blog about the encounter? You might want to alert the press so they'll know not to photograph the next defendant who walks out of the courthouse without him signing a release form.

    -Ev

  15. #15
    God/dess
    Joined
    Dec 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,218
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 209 Times in 142 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by evan_essence View Post
    And, besides, Denny Crane, what makes you think the law requires permission to take a photo of a person in public view and post it to a blog about the encounter? You might want to alert the press so they'll know not to photograph the next defendant who walks out of the courthouse without him signing a release form. -Ev
    I always thought there was the presumption of innocence.

    If a defendant is photographed walking out of a courtroom, the caption to the photo usually reads Mr X on trial for.../Mr X acquitted from ..../Mr X found guilty of.... In each case we know he is being judged by a jury of his peers according to process of law.

    On this website the picture says HARRASSER, yet who's he been found guilty by??? It's just an arbitary judgement and could amount to defamation of character if the 'harrassment' would be beemed acceptable by 99% of the population but not by the person who posted the photo.

    Quote Originally Posted by doc-catfish View Post
    That's the thing. I was raised to be courteous and respectful towards women, therefore I don't make gratuitous sexual comments at strange women, at least not intentionally.
    Ditto. I wouldn't make any comment to a woman that might be misconstrued until I'd talked to her for a few moments and had a feel for what was or was not acceptable. If in doubt - keep mouth shut.

    What I don't want is my photo spread all over the internet as a result of some arbitary judgement that what I said or did constitutes harrassment, particularly if my actions would normally be acceptable to 99% of the population.

    What gives them the right to judge me and decide to publicly label me as a harrasser without proccess of law?

    Phil.

  16. #16
    God/dess mr_punk's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Arrr! gimme no trouble, girl! Cap'n Trumpet's the name. Now, blow it.
    Posts
    2,863
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    On the other hand, guys who are harassing you in public are not entitled to that courtesy. This is seriously contentious?
    courtesy? who's talking about courtesy? look, either you have their permission or you don't have it. someone harrassing another person doesn't give their permission to post it on the internet. surely, you wouldn't like it if i posted pics of a stripper sucking my cock without her permission? harassing you? well, obviously that is a point of contention or not according to HB.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    Well, not for nothing, but they didn't say that men didn't count in reverse cases; they said that their website was dedicated to certain kind of power dynamic and not just a repository for unpleasant incidents.
    well, it's just as i thought, isn't it? PC.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    Well, I think I addressed this. Culpable versus non-culpable behaviour. It's silly to act like they should be met with the same kind of deference.
    deference? did i say you had to defer to the patriarchy in every instance? Culpable? you're not LE. like i said, i do think they have a legitimate beef about the harrassment in many instances. however, as Doc pointed out, the person who is taking the picture and posting it on HB is the final arbiter of culpability. so, if they're going to hang some guy by his scrotum simply because he leered at a woman's ass. well, excuse me if i don't defer and take them seriously with respect to culpability in that instance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jenny
    Okay... I mean, not the impression I got from reading the entries, but as I said, I didn't read carefully so I'll trust you. However, the principle argument there is WHAT constitutes street harassment, not that harassers shouldn't be photographed and blogged or that street harassment is not big deal that women should just suck up.
    whatever gave you the idea that i thought it wasn't the principal argument. after all, that's why i started the thread. i just think it funny how you're not working yourself up in a feminist outrage when tables are turned. but hey, i understand. it's an opportunity that can't be passed up.
    Is it not a problem that the woman have a smaller brain than a man? The government scientist Dr. Yamuka has proved it is size of squirrel. - Borat

    Alan Marciano
    : Oh, man...(to himself) Why did I get mixed up with that bitch?
    Lt. Vincent Hanna: Cause she's got a great ass and you got your head all the way up it! - from the movie "Heat".

  17. #17
    God/dess mr_punk's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Arrr! gimme no trouble, girl! Cap'n Trumpet's the name. Now, blow it.
    Posts
    2,863
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by evan_essence
    You can?? Gee, that's funny. I hardly call it sympathizing in your original post to dismiss the picture of the guy exposing his genitals in public like it were a joke. See, this is what I call irony.
    ROTFLMAO...now, you're trying to be funny? i agree, that is ironic.
    Quote Originally Posted by evan_essence
    You might want to alert the press so they'll know not to photograph the next defendant who walks out of the courthouse without him signing a release form.
    you're comparing these people to the press? what next? you're going to compare them to LE. oh wait, that's already been done.
    Is it not a problem that the woman have a smaller brain than a man? The government scientist Dr. Yamuka has proved it is size of squirrel. - Borat

    Alan Marciano
    : Oh, man...(to himself) Why did I get mixed up with that bitch?
    Lt. Vincent Hanna: Cause she's got a great ass and you got your head all the way up it! - from the movie "Heat".

  18. #18
    God/dess mr_punk's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Arrr! gimme no trouble, girl! Cap'n Trumpet's the name. Now, blow it.
    Posts
    2,863
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    oh, here's another one i think hardly qualifies as harassment. the only thing this guy seems to be guilty of is having a very, very weak game. it's the one dated Monday, March 13, 2006 and titled, "The Pimp of the Sea". hold on, Pimp of the Sea? LOL...okay, calling oneself Pimp of the Sea like you're Charlie the freaking Tuna isn't going to help lock down on some tail.
    Is it not a problem that the woman have a smaller brain than a man? The government scientist Dr. Yamuka has proved it is size of squirrel. - Borat

    Alan Marciano
    : Oh, man...(to himself) Why did I get mixed up with that bitch?
    Lt. Vincent Hanna: Cause she's got a great ass and you got your head all the way up it! - from the movie "Heat".

  19. #19
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil-W View Post
    What gives them the right to judge me and decide to publicly label me as a harrasser without proccess of law?

    Phil.
    Um, the fact that street harassment, while obnoxious, is not against the law? That it is (much like photograhing the harassers) LEGAL behaviour that is, nonetheless, engineered to engender shame in the target? And because the result of the "verdict" (the decision to post the photo) is not really the same as the result of of committing a crime? I mean, you would hardly be going to jail. You would have your photo up with a commentary on how you said "Hey Beautiful" and thought it was okay. Demanding a process of law is demanding a bit much for a blog of culpable behaviour, isn't it?

    Honestly, my solution to this kind of shit is: IPOD. Completely shuts out the outside world. But for those women and girls who are so inclined - rock on. I do find it interesting how many guys see it, and while not condoning the harassers STILL just think the best thing the women can do is take it.
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  20. #20
    God/dess Jenny's Avatar
    Joined
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    9,746
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 50 Times in 31 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_punk View Post
    courtesy? who's talking about courtesy? look, either you have their permission or you don't have it.
    Um, I was? Because it is discourteous of MW to post his friend's pic without permission, not illegal?

    someone harrassing another person doesn't give their permission to post it on the internet. surely, you wouldn't like it if i posted pics of a stripper sucking my cock without her permission? harassing you? well, obviously that is a point of contention or not according to HB.
    No. As I said - culpable versus non-culpable behaviour. If your goal is shame all strippers who give blowjobs.... Although that is also pornographic, and thus subject to a different kind of evaluation.

    well, it's just as i thought, isn't it? PC.
    Well, that depends on what you call "PC". I think we've established that you frequently misuse such terms. And I think I outlined that it, in fact, WASN'T what you thought and that you were essentially attempting to collapse it into grossly simplistic terms that would serve your purposes rather than actually looking at what they said.

    deference? did i say you had to defer to the patriarchy in every instance? Culpable? you're not LE. like i said, i do think they have a legitimate beef about the harrassment in many instances. however, as Doc pointed out, the person who is taking the picture and posting it on HB is the final arbiter of culpability. so, if they're going to hang some guy by his scrotum simply because he leered at a woman's ass. well, excuse me if i don't defer and take them seriously with respect to culpability in that instance.
    Um, I know I'm not LE. However surely we are not at a point when only police officer can determine what behaviour is BAD and GOOD for non-legal and non-criminal purposes. Doc pointed out correctly; however they postes a photo of a guy looking at a woman's butt. That is true and accurate. It's hardly hanging him by his scrotum. I mean all you guys looked at it and thought "Well, he's not doing anything" - so where's the problem exactly? You were perfectly capable of distinguishing (or so you say now) the behaviour; maybe other people are too. Although reading your last sentence, I'm not sure if you know what I mean. You might want to read the post again.

    whatever gave you the idea that i thought it wasn't the principal argument. after all, that's why i started the thread. i just think it funny how you're not working yourself up in a feminist outrage when tables are turned. but hey, i understand. it's an opportunity that can't be passed up.
    Again, I think there is a perfectly logical rationale, which I've already outlined: that permission before posting photos is a courtesy, and it is not a courtesy owed to people harassing you on the street. To me that makes perfect sense and you really haven't said anything all that intelligent to derail it. So, in a nutshell - the tables AREN'T turned. These are just new tables. If you are curious; if MW's friend was posting photos of him in the context in which he was posting photos of her, I would think that she should have his permission. In a thread on LO, by the way, where a woman posted a photo (ostensibly) of her boyfriend's genitalia with disparaging remarks EVERYONE (practically) told her that was horrifying and that she shouldn't be posting photos of her boyfriend's dick with his permission. THAT would the "reverse table". Not just any situation involving a photo.

    whatever gave you the idea that i thought it wasn't the principal argument.
    The fact that you seemed to think it was equally unacceptable for them to photograph and blog the guy who was exposing himself to them. It seemed like you didn't think that they ought to blogging their harassers instead of limiting their definition of harassment. Hey, if you've changed your mind, that is fine by me.
    I have taught that the sky in all its zones is mortal and its substance was formed by a process of birth

  21. #21
    Featured Member sander8son's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2003
    Location
    Under Bridge 227 on I-95, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,621
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    god you people suck at life.

    like doc said, the street harrassers DONT care that their pics are being posted. Jenny you mention how the one guy covered his face so its obviously working(he left the train immediately too). however, i bet it hasn't stopped his "activity". he probably just waited for the next train. and also i dont see how wearing something revealing is harrassing. all he was doing was sitting and reading. so because some cunt squinted and strained her eyes to look up his short shorts and she could sort of make out his junk, all of a sudden he's a disgusting pervert? what about all the broads that wear short skirts/dresses with no panties? oh thats right, its ok if you've got a snatch.

    **edit** oh yah, so point being. these guys who are harrassing broads wont stop. the one guy who did stop wasn't harrassing anyone(and like i said, probably only temporary). the alpha-male harrassers will laugh it off. they're used to rejection and they're just playing the odds. if you dont play, you can't win. pics on the internet aren't exactly going to harm them in anyway. hell its more face time for them, i'm sure they're psyched. "yah, i'm famous, some bitch put my pics on da 'net yo!"****

    now doc, stop being a fag. i dont see how this site is going to make men who dont "harrass" women become bitter towards their plight. they're too big of "nice guys" to change their ways anyway. besides, if you and i weren't disgusting perverts on this site we wouldn't even know it exists. I'm sure most "nice guys" will never come accross the site in their lives. but if they did, they'd probably instantly call up their female "friends" and leave them a voicemail about the site and hoping they dont have to deal with the harrassment on a daily basis, and if they do that he would be more than happy to walk her around. why leaving a voicemail as opposed to talking to her? she's too busy fucking a guy who approached her.

    let these twats have their site. They can bitch all they want. but if they really wanted to rid the world of these types, all theyd have to do is stop breading with alpha-males. when are you guys going to learn that us women just want to complain? its what gets us off(well, that and fucking assholes... or rather, getting fucked in the asshole by dicks).

  22. #22
    God/dess Casual Observer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Boston MA
    Posts
    5,670
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 144 Times in 74 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Well, that depends on what you call "PC". I think we've established that you frequently misuse such terms. And I think I outlined that it, in fact, WASN'T what you thought and that you were essentially attempting to collapse it into grossly simplistic terms that would serve your purposes rather than actually looking at what they said.
    Basically, this is Jenny's classically talented way of saying, "If I deconstruct everything, I can derive whatever meaning I want from any given idea, irrespective of intent, context or delivery." Pure deflection.

    Well, not for nothing, but they didn't say that men didn't count in reverse cases; they said that their website was dedicated to certain kind of power dynamic and not just a repository for unpleasant incidents.
    My, how very Animal Farm of you...all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. Please, don't hold your breath for my shock or surprise.

    In short, in the name of "empowerment" the HB folks really just end up empowering their enemies, and alienating others who might otherwise sympathize with them. Not very linear thinking IMO.
    Well said.

    Who said misandry was dead?
    Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality, the costs become prohibitive.

    William F. Buckley, Jr.

  23. #23
    Featured Member sander8son's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2003
    Location
    Under Bridge 227 on I-95, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,621
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Casual Observer View Post
    My, how very Animal Farm of you...all animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. Please, don't hold your breath for my shock or surprise.
    Yah, but in animal farm the pigs were "more equal" than the other animals. this is more like bizzaro animal farm

  24. #24
    God/dess doc-catfish's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2002
    Location
    123 Tornado Alley Way, Hooterville USA
    Posts
    6,322
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    http://hollabacknyc.blogspot.com/200...c_archive.html

    October 15 - Be careful what "literature" you read in public fellas.

    October 19 - Why I don't go to the ol' ball game anymore.
    Former SCJ now in rehab.

  25. #25
    Featured Member sander8son's Avatar
    Joined
    May 2003
    Location
    Under Bridge 227 on I-95, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,621
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Re: who's twisting these biatches tits?

    Quote Originally Posted by doc-catfish View Post
    http://hollabacknyc.blogspot.com/200...c_archive.html

    October 19 - Why I don't go to the ol' ball game anymore.
    LMAO. the post from the 19th. Clearly these broads don't belong at sox v. yankees games. Invectives and drips of beer is getting off lightly when these two meet. perhaps she should stick to devil rays games. And it goes both ways. Plenty of assholes in both boston and new york.

    And having wedding rings means shit, if you're from Mass. Legalized gay marraige, ya dumb broads. That and a large amount of guys(me included) DONT LOOK AT YOUR HANDS FOR RINGS. WE DONT CARE. a married chick can fuck you the same as a single chick.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. BiG TITS..
    By whirlerz in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-14-2011, 12:37 PM
  2. Insecure biatches!
    By Niko-n-Justine in forum Camming Connection
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-21-2011, 12:08 PM
  3. It's my birthday biatches!!!!!
    By TouringGirlfriend in forum Other Work
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-23-2011, 02:21 PM
  4. Can my tits fit in this??
    By cinammonkisses in forum Body Business
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 03-30-2007, 09:57 PM
  5. Great Tits
    By lethalsoul in forum The Lounge
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-11-2006, 10:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •