I though this was fun to read. This Lady is one pissed off Anti Communist, Anti Feminist Libertarian. I have read some serious rants on Libertarian sites complete. Hats off to her though she really hates everyone in Washington. Refreshing.![]()
Go Devvy!





I though this was fun to read. This Lady is one pissed off Anti Communist, Anti Feminist Libertarian. I have read some serious rants on Libertarian sites complete. Hats off to her though she really hates everyone in Washington. Refreshing.![]()
Go Devvy!
Last edited by ArmySGT.; 01-12-2007 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Typing *shrugs*





^^^ I can relate to her hatred of everything Washington DC related !!!
I can also relate to her citing of the additional costs = additional taxes which will eventually have to be collected to fund Nancy Pelosi's 'brassiere brigade' proposals.
Hillary Clinton, the Democratic party's leading presidential candidate, flat out opposes withdrawal – which is about the only consistent aspect of her always-evolving position. You'll remember that it was Hillary who first started talking about a surge, albeit not in those precise words, two years ago, loudly insisting that we need "more troops," and certainly not less, in our pursuit of "success." Now she's talking about "phased redeployment," in tune with the Democratic caucus majority and the public mood, but she can rightly claim at least co-authorship (along with John McCain) of the basic "surge" concept.
It is the democrats who keep bringing up a legislation to institute the draft also.
Lotta people read the rhetoric but not the Thomas system.





and the first efforts to provide additional revenues to fund 'brassiere brigade' proposals are already underway ...
(snip)"Rangel yesterday swatted down a tax hike that Pelosi has floated, and he made an end run around her decision to bypass House committees in a rush to bring bills to a vote.
"There's a lot of tension there," one Democratic lawmaker said of the relationship between Rangel and Pelosi.
Rangel, who took over the powerful Ways and Means Committee after 36 years in Congress, smacked down the idea Pelosi raised on Sunday of repealing tax cuts for those earning more than $500,000 per year.
"We haven't gotten that far to be talking about tax increases," Rangel told The Post. "She hasn't discussed it with me . . . We haven't gotten into tax policy."
Pelosi had said nixing tax cuts for half-million-dollar earners "might be more important to the American people than ignoring the educational and health needs of America's children."
But Rangel, whose committee handles tax policy, dismissed Pelosi's idea as unlikely to happen, since the speaker didn't bother to vet it with him in advance.
"Saying it to me in private is far more important than whatever she says nationally," he huffed, referring to her weekend TV appearance.
By calling out Pelosi, Rangel, a liberal firebrand himself, has emerged as the first old-school committee "baron" with the political juice to spar with the ascendant speaker."(snip)
Bookmarks