Check out the feedback section....5 bucks says you won't like it!![]()
Check out the feedback section....5 bucks says you won't like it!![]()
I agree. Tell us! Even if I wanted to run to the store, I wouldn't spend a dime on the magazine.
Well I thought I had it...but it was Marie Claire, not Glamour. The nearest grocery store is 10 miles away, pleeeaasee tell us EE!
K, I looked while in the check out (no way I am buying that rag) and there were three comments in the feed back section, two of them LOVED Harmony's article. One of them said it wasn't a good representation. That's it. End.
UGH!
*$#@(&^!!!!!!!!!! on Glamour! >:|
Ok, got the magazine just so I could share with you ladies.
It's the March issue actually. It only had 3 opinions from the article. Suprise suprise, 2 atta boys and one short blurb for us.
From Glamour Magazine- You Said It:
"Escaping the triple-X life"
-"No One Should Have to Be a Stripper" was great! The sex industry needs to be exposed. Harmony Dust exemplifies courage and transformation. I hope this article helps women realize their value.
Kay Henry; Long Beach, CA
-The adverse effects that stripping has on women are rarely publicized. The profession has ruined several of my friends' lives. I hope Harmony's story resonates with people who glorify this industry.
Lotus Pilborough; Philidelphia
- Not all dancers are pathetic, desperate women without goals. I used to strip, and the last thing my coworkers wanted was people's pity. We only wanted respect for making our own decisions.
Kay B.; Buffalo, NY
This is so slanted. Funny how many more eloquent letters FOR stripping were written and never published. Yet the boring ones against it were printed; and two of them!
Funny how neither one of the ones against stripping were ever even strippers themselves to begin with
And what exactly does the sex industry need to be exposed for? We're pretty straight forward and NOT going away.
Bumpity bump bump for the curious SWers....
Simply exercising their editorial bias; they know their audience--insecure women threatened by other women hot enough to be strippers, who will buy products advertised in the publication in a (futile) attempt to draw the attention of men (and women) as would a woman hot enough to strip.This is so slanted. Funny how many more eloquent letters FOR stripping were written and never published. Yet the boring ones against it were printed; and two of them!
Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality, the costs become prohibitive.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Urge to kill rising... ARGH!That really pisses me off!!!!! It never ceases to amaze me that people can have such strong opinions on something that they don't understand. I hate that magazine now. BOYCOTT!
![]()
If you think school is hard, try being stupid.
Very true! Glamour knows what they're doing. If they even slightly slanted the editorials and even the article to take a pro stripping stance, they'd get tons of hate mail, cancelled subscriptions, etc. Even if most at the Glamour office take a pro stripping stance they wouldn't be stupid enough to make it public. Hot strippers aren't really their target audience.




Very precisely observed Casual Observer.
Glamour; consider yourself boycotted.





magazines are stupid anyway! *grumble grumble*
SWers should be using them to make money from.... ie. on the pages/covers... and that's about it.
fuck their "editorial" content and other BS... waste of energy. let the not-hot dreamers have that.
Bookmarks