Wow, interesting thread. Don't know why it got so heated, but perhaps a more appropriate title here would have been "Appearance Isn't Everything".
Since some of you are already deconstructing Kaylinn's "experiment" here as flawed because the more attractive dancer approached while she was present while the less attractive one approached while she was absent.
I think another thing that has to be considered here, is that you gals tend to have a far more critical eye for beauty than we men do. Perhaps in the eyes of Kaylinn's BF, the discrepancy in appearance wasn't as steep as she's implied that it was. We only have her testimony to go on after all. Also there's nothing here to suggest that the more attractive dancer's hustle would have won him over had she not been present.
The fact is, we men will trade a few points (and I stress a FEW) in appearance for a gal who looks to be more fun. There's nothing in that statement of course that says a dancer can't excel in both departments.
All other things being equal, most certainly. The thing is in a real life SC experience, that scenario of side-by-side rarely presents itself. The fact is that because a bombshell dancer has a broader appeal she is often more busy. Unless we get lucky and our timing is good, we often can't get to the bombshell. She's effectively unavailable, even if we can see her hotness from across the room.
And since like any dancer she can only attend to one party at one time, naturally she's going to go after the ones whom are most lucrative to her. That means passing less lucrative ones up. Is that snottiness on her part? Not in the least, simply good business sense in managing her time. But to those whom she has to pass up, its going to be perceived as snottiness.
I think there's the overachiever/underachiever apsect that hasn't been brought up. A gal who is a '10' learns in practice that because her looks give her a competitive advantage that attract big spenders, and therefore she doesn't have to hustle as hard. In fact its often not worth the effort to do so when 60% effort still results in 100% earnings. A gal like that can get in a habit of resting on her laurels which can backfire on nights when there are no big spenders.
Meanwhile a less attractive dancer who knows she is at a competitive disadvantage is going to ratchet her charm and performance skills up a notch to compensate. The good thing for her is that since the bombshell is often unavailable to most customers, this frees them up for her giving time to show her personality, sometimes before the bombshell is even seen.
Of course, several trips later when these customers have established some regularity with the less attractive dancers, they're enamored to those dancers to the point where on that night when the bombshell has to approach them, that they turns her down. By then, any attributes aside from appearance aren't so equal anymore.




Furthermore, there are PLENTY of less-attractive girls who are supreme lazyasses and horrible hustlers with shit personalities. TONS. Sometimes that's why said girls can be found sucking cock in the corner for $60 OR sulking in the dressing room all night with $40 in their garters.

Bookmarks