This thread and post will my last on the subject of global warming.
( I know some of you out there are saying "thanks be to god" ) LOL!
The following quote perfectly explains why I have such trouble giving equal consideration to the arguements that some of the people here have tried to use to back up their opinion and position on climate change. Please refer to it if or when anyone has comment or question about my strong opposition to the theory that human use of fossil fuels are not the main cause of the current global warming issue.
'While giving equal coverage to two opposing sides may seem appropriate in political discourse, it is manifestly inappropriate in discussions of science, where objective truths exist. In the case of climate change, a exists among mainstream researchers that human influences on climate are already detectable, and that potentially far more substantial changes are likely to take place in the future if we continue to burn fossil fuels at current rates. There are only a handful of "contrarian" climate scientists who continue to dispute that consensus. To give these contrarians equal time or space in public discourse on climate change out of a sense of need for journalistic "balance" is as indefensible as, say, granting the an equal say with in the design of a new space satellite. It's plainly inappropriate.'
The End![]()





Bookmarks