Dude, are you capable of posting a thread that isn't fucking stupid, inane, trite, asinine, retarded, vacous, and oriented towards simpletons?
I know you're only 19, but c'mon. Do you really not have enough sense to understand that you are posting on a site full of strong, independant women. Have you ever even been to a stripclub?
Why are you posting misogynistic shit like this? The chivarly you speak of never existed. It is fiction and fantasy. Men used to perform "chivalrous" tasks of opening doors for women and taking care of their needs because women were considered helpless, and thus subjegated.
In many cultures women didn't have a choice who they were to be with. All of the wooing was for show when marriage was but a contract between the families of the betrothed.
And please state the source of this "scientifically proven fact" that a woman's attraction decreases by 50% once they find out that a man is in fact attracted to them. The truth is, most of us here are very attractive women, and almost all men are attracted to us. Big fucking deal. Not all of them are exactly prizes. Most of you would have been cannon fodder, historically. If a man I am attracted to is also attracted to me, NOTHING drops 50%. In fact, if this is true, we'll probably be fucking pretty soon. Its pretty simple.
Aside from that, chivalrous love is defined perfectly by Mr. Chris above. This is life, not an insipid romantic comedy. A guy can give as many gifts as he wants. If he doesn't honestly tell the girl his motivations, and demand her honesty in place, he's going to end up being the manbitch who walks her dog when she's out of town. Ouch, but its true.
GAWD, I fucking hate these types of articles. A loser is a loser, whether in this day or 50 years ago. Quit romanticizing the past!




Reply With Quote



Bookmarks