(snip)"Hedge funds are attacking bank decisions that help delinquent US mortgage borrowers remain in their homes in a move that pits some of the country's richest people against its least well-off.
The dispute centres on derivatives contracts that pay money to investors when bonds backed by subprime mortgage loans - extended to people with past credit problems - run into trouble. The $1,200bn (EU890bn) US subprime mortgage bond market has been hit recently by rapidly growing defaults, and hedge funds have profited from the crisis by buying such derivatives.
Some hedge funds say they are concerned that banks that both sell the derivatives contracts and handle mortgage payments could be involved in a form of market manipulation. The funds fear that banks are making concessions on the underlying mortgages to avoid making good on derivatives contracts that pay off in cases of default.
The controversy pits hedge fund interests against those of stretched US mortgage borrowers and politicians who want to help them keep their homes, underscoring the political dilemmas created by the growth of the mortgage bond market
A group of more than 25 funds has asked the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the derivatives industry body, to act on their concerns, according to a letter seen by the Financial Times.
"ISDA should actively promote an industry solution that assures market participants that no one can engage in practices that are manipulative and prohibited by existing securities laws," the funds said. ISDA declined to comment.
The hedge funds' concerns centre on loan modifications that are often used to help overextended borrowers keep up with payments. In such cases, 40 per cent of the modified loans fall back into arrears within a year, credit analysts say.
Yet, these changes do not automatically trigger write-downs on the bonds, which would result in a payment to purchasers of the credit-insurance derivatives.
One member of the group that wrote to ISDA said the hedge funds were not trying to force subprime borrowers from their homes - just to make sure that banks were keeping the interests of their trading desks and their mortgage arms separate."(snip)
IMHO this is bad news for troubled mortgage-holders, as banks are going to be under pressure / scrutiny NOT to renegotiate even if bank management was inclined to do so in order to avoid foreclosure upon houses that they don't want and can't sell. The pressure is due to the fact that, for the first time, declaring a mortgage in default now triggers bank payoffs on credit default contracts as well as triggering write-off of the mortgage losses themselves.
IMHO this is even worse news for banks that have lent heavily for mortgages, since the hedge funds call to enforce Securities Laws could force the banks to take a double whammy ... the immediate foreclosures and write-off of the belly up mortgages which will hit the bank's bottom line, as well as forcing those same banks to pay off on the mortgage default contracts the banks previously sold to the hedge funds which will hit the banks' bottom line a second time.
IMHO there will only be two groups of 'winners' to come out of this conflict. The first is obviously the 'qualified investors' (i.e. people with over $1 million dollar net worth) who participate in the hedge funds, who will profit immediately. The second is bargain hunters looking to purchase housing on the cheap, who will profit a year or two down the road as more and more foreclosed homes are added to the already large pool of homes on the market that remain unsold.
The 'bears' out there have mentioned the distinct possibility that this upcoming double whammy has the potential for sending some banks themselves into bankruptcy and/or issuing a fresh call for a gov't bailout of the banks a la the 1980's S&L crisis (with associated tax increases to pay for the bailout).
!



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks