
Originally Posted by
Embyr
... ????? i don't understand?? if I used MY money for the tattoo and knew that his "contribution" was going towards other purposes... it wouldn't taint the tattoo at all.
the "loan" reference.... could you please explain it?? you mean the guy wanted the $$ back, right??? Umm, I don't think this guy is illigitimate... nor catty, nor pouty, nor the type that would ask for $ back that in HIS mind is obviously "already gone...." as in, invested in my backpiece. The fact that the $ would simply be replacing in my savings what isn't there because of the tat seems irrelevant to me. The amount is the same, but I pay with MY tattoo fund. Untainted money.
Bookmarks