It's obvious that women have had a revolution. We can vote, we can work out of the home, and we can control our fertility. However, I feel that the shift of equality of the sexes has not reached men in the same way. Since men are 50% of the population, I feel that feminism and equality of the sexes cannot be achieved unless men have a revolution of their own. This inequality hurts men as well as women. For example, if a man takes his wife's last name, he is ridiculed as a pussywhipped granola going against the natural/holy order of things. He also has to go through the process of name change while women only have to get their legal documents and IDs changed. Women can have maternity leave, but men do not always get paternity leave.
Back in the days before suffrage, men ran the system. Unless the women packed up and moved to Estrogen-topia to start up their own society, they would not be able to get their way unless the men changed in some way, shape, or form. It's the same way today. Men and women both compose 50% of the population, so there has to be harmony in order to achieve equality.
Do you believe that there needs to be a male revolution to realize that times have changed, and that men are hurt by gender stereotypes as well as women?



Reply With Quote
), but there's a growing body of literature that suggests that the educational system is increasingly hostile to boys and in some cases outright emasculating.

Bookmarks