no, actually it's not. Both situations are such that the tax payers are asked or forced (depending on a person's pov) to fund something that they may or may not support or agree with through tax credits.
This means that I, for example have to help you pay for your implants and you have to help people like me pay for my solar. I sure as hell don't agree with having to help fund your implants and I understand you don't like having to help fund solar energy. But this is just the way things work here in the good old USA
I could better respect you position on tax credits for solar if you wanted to do away with all tax credits in general, but you don't. You just seem to want to do away with tax credits that you personally don't like, take or want to take. Yet you want to keep the ones you do like, use or want to use.
Basicaly you want people to subsidize your stuff but not the other way around. It doesn't work that way. Tax credits are a tit for tat thing. Forgive the pun.
Bookmarks